The Concert for George, a tribute to George Harrison, was on PBS the other night and we all sat down to watch it. It brought me to tears several times. What exactly brought on the tears? Well, it's like this: Eric Clapton was of course a close friend of George's for many years. So he was the producer of the show. Jeff Lynn was there too. Jeff Lynn is one of the premiere rock producers ever. So the show was just plain good. But what really did it was the authenticity of the guitar work. George Harrison was "just the guitar" player of the Beatles. So they happen to be the biggest rock act ever, he's still just the guitar player. You don't hear the extended solos from Harrison that we've become used to in the rock n roll world. Typically, just 8 bars - sometimes 16. When he took the solo, it counted. It had melody. It meant something.
So Clapton was smart enough to get two great guitarists to back up the sound for this concert. And man were they good. The...
The ridiculous title is on behalf of all my liberal/moderate friends who may have considered voting for the President if it wasn't for the Iraqi War. In other words, that single issue is keeping them from voting for him.
Whereas:
Sometimes, war is a necessary evil Your freedom was attacked on Sept. 11, 2001 and they'd kill you and your children if they could A solution must be sought; doing nothing is not an option A strategy to establish a democratic stronghold in the Middle East is risky and ugly but it is the best option The war we put off today will be fought tomorrow Therefore: Vote for President Bush If the Iraqi War is just one of many reasons you won't be voting for the President, that's great. Tell me about it on your own blog. But if you'd like to vote for him but just can't because of the war, then tell me which of those 5 points you don't agree with. If you can convince me that any of them is false, I'll....OK, I won't vote for Ker...
Make no mistake, folks who want to see the Ten Commandments taken out of every civil building in the country are not non-religious ; they are anti-religious . And, there's a big difference between the two. Non-religious people do not believe in God. God doesn't exist, He/She/It didn't create the world, nor do they, or have they, ever interceded in history. Obviously not, if they don't exist. But, if people really believe this, then they can be said to have a belief system. We call these belief systems Religion. So, really, they are religious, just not in the way that I am. That's great. Then there are the anti-religious people. These are folks who think that religion is bad and should be destroyed; wiped away from history once and for all. These people, I believe, are, in fact, very religious. We might call them fundamentalist. They believe so strongly in their system that all other systems need to be done away with. Like a Crusade or a Jihad you might say. Well I...